So this is weird...
Check out page A12 of the Times Union today.
Skin cancer 'vaccine' sees progress
Huh. That struck me as a bit odd.
So I dug through my archives.
Interesting.
"Cancer vaccine passes the test"
"Merck suspends lobbying for vaccine"
Etc.
All those stories about Gardisil portrayed it as a "cervical cancer vaccine", despite the fact that it is not a cancer vaccine, it's supposed to prevent the virus that causes many cases of cervical cancer. Yet the paper never described it as a 'vaccine'.
Odd, now this "novel treatment...called a cancer vaccine, even though it treats disease rather than prevents it" rates a pair of 's around 'vaccine'.
The story itself drops the 's, but just seeing a more accurate headline is interesting.
Wonder why the change in heart at the AP.
Sunday, May 31, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment